H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Leander Paes vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 0-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1997 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #64 6-3 7-5 6-4 Leander Paes #103 Match data Jun 25, 1997* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leander Paes Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leander Paes Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 106/129 of Leander Paes's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Leander Paes Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1% 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4% 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9% 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1% 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3% 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6% 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6% 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%
Career — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8% — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leander Paes Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +0.09 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.13 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 +1.81 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +1.30 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26
26 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.