H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Leander Paes vs Patrick Baur H2H: 1-0
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Baur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1996* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Leander Paes | 6-3 6-4 | Patrick Baur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patrick Baur | #571 | #74 | 476 | 1,697 | 67 | 107 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leander Paes | Patrick Baur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #178 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #192 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #82 | 1,494 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #130 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #257 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #180 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #380 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |