H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Learner Tien vs Brandon Nakashima H2H: 0-1

Brandon Nakashima holds a 1–0 lead over Learner Tien in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brandon Nakashima leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brandon Nakashima won the 2025 Stuttgart Open second round 7-6(5) 6-3.

United States Age 20 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brandon Nakashima #31 7-6(5) 6-3 Learner Tien #68 Match data Jun 13, 2025* R16 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Learner Tien #17 #12 2,755 1,974 65 45 59.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Brandon Nakashima #19 #16 2,485 1,952 152 127 54.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Learner Tien Brandon Nakashima
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2022 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2023 0–1 0.0% #452 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2024 3–2 60.0% #122 1,567 0 0 2020 3–2 60.0% #166 1,547 0 0
19 2025 32–23 58.2% #28 1,910 0 1 2021 15–10 60.0% #68 1,800 0 0
20 2026 30–18 62.5% #17 1,889 0 2 2022 30–23 56.6% #47 1,860 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2023 13–20 39.4% #134 1,683 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2024 25–23 52.1% #38 1,815 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2025 33–29 53.2% #35 1,781 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2026 33–20 62.3% #19 1,888 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Learner Tien Brandon Nakashima
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2024 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2025 27 14 41 65.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2021 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2026 19 12 31 61.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2022 21 16 37 56.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 13 14 27 48.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 21 19 40 52.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 24 13 37 64.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
Career — 49 30 79 62.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — 106 86 192 55.2% 22 24 46 47.8% 24 17 41 58.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 105/111 of Learner Tien's and 276/280 of Brandon Nakashima's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Learner Tien Brandon Nakashima
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2022 1/1 5.0 4.0 66.7% 66.2% 37.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.8% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2023 1/1 4.0 6.0 61.2% 53.5% 37.8% 68.0% 50.0% 47.4% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2024 5/5 2.8 1.8 68.7% 60.9% 59.0% 63.2% 34.4% 60.1% 39.8% 2020 5/5 6.8 2.4 59.6% 73.4% 60.6% 75.0% 50.0% 68.6% 37.9%
19 2025 50/55 3.9 4.3 60.2% 68.3% 51.3% 62.8% 40.7% 61.4% 36.6% 2021 25/25 7.8 2.3 57.7% 74.9% 54.0% 61.6% 50.0% 66.3% 35.7%
20 2026 48/49 6.0 4.2 63.2% 70.5% 51.0% 52.1% 42.5% 63.3% 38.4% 2022 53/53 7.4 1.7 65.2% 74.5% 54.8% 57.0% 37.7% 67.5% 35.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 33/33 7.5 2.1 64.9% 74.6% 51.3% 55.4% 33.5% 66.6% 34.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 47/48 8.6 1.1 66.1% 74.7% 55.5% 69.2% 37.7% 68.4% 33.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 60/62 8.6 1.1 65.3% 74.7% 52.8% 57.7% 35.8% 67.1% 35.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 53/54 9.9 1.2 65.8% 78.1% 51.9% 57.6% 39.2% 69.1% 35.2%
Career — 105/111 4.8 4.2 62.0% 68.8% 51.3% 57.9% 41.2% 62.0% 37.5% — 276/280 8.4 1.5 64.7% 75.3% 53.5% 59.9% 38.4% 67.7% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Learner Tien Brandon Nakashima
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2022 1496 106.9 +1.66 0.00 0.741 44.9% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09 2018 1497 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2023 1480 110.3 -1.68 +2.67 0.642 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2024 1567 118.8 -1.17 +0.87 0.996 49.6% +23 — — 50.0% -0.07 2–0 1–1 — -0.03 2020 1548 129.2 +2.04 +0.75 1.207 53.6% +61 — — 64.3% +0.79 0–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.05
19 2025 1911 146.7 -1.79 +0.93 0.946 49.5% +10 -354 -269 54.1% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 17–10 (63%) 110.6 -0.50 2021 1800 141.9 +1.63 +0.45 1.060 51.1% +26 — — 55.4% +0.45 7–3 (70%) 8–7 (53%) 105.9 -0.32
20 2026 1890 153.1 -0.44 +2.91 1.047 50.8% +33 -139 -246 56.9% +0.34 13–6 (68%) 19–8 (70%) 112.3 +1.29 2022 1860 147.5 +2.80 -0.54 1.089 51.3% -10 -291 -14 56.7% +0.34 5–6 (45%) 23–10 (70%) 106.7 +0.88
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1684 134.4 +1.89 -1.46 1.015 49.9% +3 -99 +55 44.3% -0.11 5–10 (33%) 14–13 (52%) 95.4 -0.78
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1815 147.2 +3.32 -0.97 1.049 50.8% -23 -119 -18 53.4% +0.39 3–7 (30%) 10–15 (40%) 92.3 -0.21
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1782 146.7 +2.07 -0.50 1.068 50.8% -5 -98 +38 50.0% +0.11 10–9 (53%) 19–24 (44%) 97.6 +1.72
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1889 154.9 +3.58 +0.50 1.141 52.1% +11 -181 -67 60.7% +0.77 8–9 (47%) 16–18 (47%) 100.2 +1.27
Career — 1974 149.3 -1.11 +1.84 0.987 50.0% +20 -214 -261 54.3% +0.13 25–12 (68%) 37–19 (66%) 118.2 +0.52 — 1952 151.1 +2.65 -0.40 1.078 51.1% +1 -150 -3 54.0% +0.34 38–45 (46%) 93–88 (51%) 99.5 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.