H2H data updated: 2026-08-07 02:15 UTC
Learner Tien vs Gael Monfils H2H: 1-0
Learner Tien holds a 1–0 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Learner Tien leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Learner Tien won the 2026 National Bank Open Presented by Rogers second round 6-3 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 20
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
France
Age 39
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learner Tien | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | Gael Monfils | Match data | Aug 5, 2026 | National Bank Open Presented by Rogers | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learner Tien | #19 | #15 | 2,290 | 1,949 | 52 | 41 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gael Monfils | #347 | #6 | 3,815 | 2,168 | 576 | 361 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Learner Tien | Gael Monfils | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #860 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #122 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2025 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #28 | 1,860 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #46 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #19 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #13 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #12 | 2,066 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 2,002 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #77 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,929 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #18 | 2,055 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,951 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #7 | 2,066 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #46 | 1,969 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #29 | 1,919 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #10 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #11 | 1,936 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #52 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #74 | 1,927 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #55 | 1,903 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,774 | 0 | 13 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #347 | 1,698 | 0 | 13 |