H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Learner Tien vs Marin Cilic H2H: 0-1

Marin Cilic holds a 1–0 lead over Learner Tien in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marin Cilic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2026 Dallas Open first round 7-5 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Learner Tien
United States Age 20 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marin Cilic #61 7-5 7-6(4) Learner Tien #23 Match data Feb 10, 2026 R32 Dallas Open ATP 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Learner Tien #15 #12 2,565 1,974 62 42 59.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marin Cilic #81 #3 5,155 2,199 578 350 62.3% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Learner Tien Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2022 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2023 0–1 0.0% #452 1,479 0 0 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,498 0 0
18 2024 3–2 60.0% #122 1,567 0 0 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2025 32–23 58.2% #28 1,910 0 1 2008 37–24 60.7% #23 1,908 0 1
20 2026 27–15 64.3% #15 1,917 0 2 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,991 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,856 0 5
22 — — — — — — — 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,966 0 6
23 — — — — — — — 2012 38–18 67.9% #15 2,004 0 8
24 — — — — — — — 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 2,005 0 9
25 — — — — — — — 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,130 1 13
26 — — — — — — — 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,064 1 14
27 — — — — — — — 2016 44–21 67.7% #6 2,135 1 16
28 — — — — — — — 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 — — — — — — — 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,053 1 18
30 — — — — — — — 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,912 1 18
31 — — — — — — — 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,841 1 18
32 — — — — — — — 2021 32–19 62.7% #30 1,928 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,953 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,933 1 20
35 — — — — — — — 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,827 1 21
36 — — — — — — — 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,825 1 21
37 — — — — — — — 2026 14–16 46.7% #81 1,748 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Learner Tien Marin Cilic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2024 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2025 27 14 41 65.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2026 16 9 25 64.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 28 14 42 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 25 14 39 64.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 10 24 58.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 14 6 20 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 37 13 50 74.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 21 10 31 67.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 15 34 55.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 15 13 28 53.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 12 30 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 20 14 34 58.8% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 9 8 17 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 46 27 73 63.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — 362 218 580 62.4% 128 91 219 58.4% 84 37 121 69.4% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 99/105 of Learner Tien's and 909/929 of Marin Cilic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Learner Tien Marin Cilic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2022 1/1 5.0 4.0 66.7% 66.2% 37.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.8% 32.0% 2005 1/1 2.0 2.0 50.8% 56.3% 45.2% 20.0% 50.0% 50.8% 33.3%
17 2023 1/1 4.0 6.0 61.2% 53.5% 37.8% 68.0% 50.0% 47.4% 33.8% 2006 14/14 5.4 3.5 54.6% 69.3% 48.4% 59.9% 29.1% 59.6% 34.4%
18 2024 5/5 2.8 1.8 68.7% 60.9% 59.0% 63.2% 34.4% 60.1% 39.8% 2007 24/24 7.0 3.5 52.6% 74.3% 48.5% 57.9% 51.0% 62.1% 36.1%
19 2025 50/55 3.9 4.3 60.2% 68.3% 51.3% 62.8% 40.7% 61.4% 36.6% 2008 59/61 9.3 3.3 53.6% 75.6% 53.2% 60.5% 38.4% 65.3% 37.5%
20 2026 42/43 6.1 4.2 63.2% 69.9% 51.0% 51.6% 43.3% 62.9% 39.0% 2009 65/65 7.8 2.7 56.6% 75.5% 53.6% 61.0% 38.2% 66.3% 40.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 59/59 7.2 2.5 58.1% 74.6% 53.5% 66.4% 43.0% 65.7% 38.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 62/63 7.0 2.6 54.7% 76.4% 54.7% 59.1% 44.6% 66.8% 38.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 54/56 6.2 2.7 55.5% 72.4% 53.2% 53.2% 46.7% 64.0% 40.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 36/37 8.4 2.4 56.4% 76.9% 57.0% 62.5% 43.3% 68.1% 38.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 71/72 10.4 2.8 56.9% 79.0% 50.9% 67.0% 39.5% 66.9% 38.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 54/54 12.0 2.6 58.8% 77.6% 52.0% 63.8% 41.8% 67.0% 36.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 62/65 10.4 2.4 55.4% 80.1% 54.7% 59.5% 40.4% 68.9% 37.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 64/65 11.3 3.1 58.5% 79.9% 54.9% 60.5% 42.7% 69.6% 39.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 58/59 10.2 3.1 58.8% 80.1% 55.1% 57.3% 40.3% 69.9% 38.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 41/42 9.7 5.0 58.3% 77.4% 47.7% 61.0% 41.9% 65.1% 35.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 21/22 10.0 3.8 59.8% 76.2% 50.1% 61.4% 33.4% 65.6% 35.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/51 11.1 3.9 58.2% 79.0% 49.9% 62.9% 38.5% 66.6% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/52 11.5 3.4 59.9% 78.9% 52.2% 61.1% 41.2% 68.0% 38.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/3 9.5 3.0 65.4% 71.9% 42.9% 64.6% 21.4% 62.6% 33.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 14/14 12.1 4.0 56.2% 77.9% 50.3% 59.7% 54.3% 65.8% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 19/19 8.7 2.8 57.0% 75.5% 50.9% 55.9% 35.8% 64.8% 30.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 29/31 9.1 3.2 58.6% 76.8% 48.4% 61.5% 37.2% 65.2% 35.0%
Career — 99/105 4.8 4.2 62.0% 68.5% 51.3% 58.0% 41.4% 61.8% 37.7% — 909/929 9.3 3.0 57.0% 77.1% 52.6% 60.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Learner Tien Marin Cilic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2022 1496 106.9 +1.66 0.00 0.741 44.9% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09 2005 1486 99.9 -3.62 -1.03 0.677 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
17 2023 1480 110.3 -1.68 +2.67 0.642 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.10 2006 1498 111.3 -1.65 -2.46 0.850 47.4% -25 +64 — 37.1% -0.77 4–3 (57%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.29
18 2024 1567 118.8 -1.17 +0.87 0.996 49.6% +23 — — 50.0% -0.07 2–0 1–1 — -0.03 2007 1715 126.8 -0.80 -0.10 0.954 49.3% -39 -98 -126 47.5% -0.11 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.13
19 2025 1911 146.7 -1.79 +0.93 0.946 49.5% +10 -354 -269 54.1% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.50 2008 1908 151.0 +2.06 +1.34 1.082 51.4% -11 -243 -142 57.3% +0.46 10–8 (56%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.68
20 2026 1918 151.6 -0.61 +3.17 1.050 50.9% +44 -169 -274 57.3% +0.38 12–4 (75%) 18–6 (75%) — +0.71 2009 1992 159.4 +3.31 +2.77 1.188 52.7% +28 -214 -200 64.9% +1.04 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +2.37
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1857 158.2 +2.35 +1.40 1.109 51.8% +72 +14 -102 58.6% +0.73 13–5 (72%) 11–19 (37%) — +1.24
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1966 162.8 +4.08 +1.86 1.156 52.2% +25 -52 -198 59.6% +0.62 12–7 (63%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.09
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2005 160.0 +1.42 +3.57 1.123 52.2% -30 +11 -22 62.0% +0.74 8–3 (73%) 11–15 (42%) — +1.95
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2005 157.1 +3.69 +2.41 1.208 52.9% +18 -88 +81 63.4% +0.90 8–5 (62%) 11–4 (73%) — +0.69
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2130 169.3 +3.49 +2.72 1.150 52.3% +34 -173 -10 65.8% +0.76 13–9 (59%) 20–9 (69%) — -2.53
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2064 160.5 +3.04 +1.34 1.114 51.7% +53 -93 +78 60.4% +0.54 12–8 (60%) 26–9 (74%) — +1.96
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2136 171.9 +5.19 +1.67 1.193 52.6% +11 -180 +58 63.1% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.16
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2055 166.2 +4.81 +4.38 1.303 53.9% -89 -3 +181 63.1% +0.91 10–12 (45%) 16–14 (53%) — +0.86
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2054 170.8 +5.78 +3.23 1.264 53.3% -14 +7 +214 64.3% +0.99 9–10 (47%) 20–18 (53%) — -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1912 154.6 +1.14 -0.18 1.003 50.4% +27 +85 +277 54.5% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1842 146.2 +1.45 -0.54 1.037 50.2% +6 +126 — 45.5% -0.05 7–4 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1929 146.3 +3.33 +0.85 1.108 51.7% -35 +4 +247 57.9% +0.43 13–8 (62%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1953 160.1 +4.07 +1.98 1.190 52.7% -43 +52 +215 60.6% +0.86 8–10 (44%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1933 104.1 +0.22 +0.03 0.907 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.03
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1827 133.0 +0.92 -0.98 0.975 50.1% -8 — — 45.7% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1825 142.2 +1.69 -2.10 0.870 48.1% +3 — +327 43.1% -0.45 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.90
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1748 138.1 +0.72 +0.13 1.005 50.1% +67 0 +278 48.6% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.87
Career — 1974 148.5 -1.22 +1.89 0.985 50.0% +23 -234 -271 54.2% +0.13 24–10 (71%) 36–17 (68%) 120.7 -0.01 — 2200 164.7 +3.06 +1.77 1.127 51.9% +6 -47 +77 59.1% +0.60 170–127 (57%) 230–214 (52%) 99.2 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.