H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC

Learner Tien vs Sebastian Baez H2H: 1-0

Learner Tien holds a 1–0 lead over Sebastian Baez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Learner Tien leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Learner Tien won the 2026 Cincinnati Open second round 6-3 7-6(4).

United States Age 20 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Argentina Age 25 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Learner Tien #12 6-3 7-6(4) Sebastian Baez #53 Match data Aug 16, 2026 R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Learner Tien #16 #12 2,755 1,974 64 44 59.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sebastian Baez #53 #18 2,250 1,898 124 128 49.2% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Learner Tien Sebastian Baez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2022 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2023 0–1 0.0% #452 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2024 3–2 60.0% #122 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2025 32–23 58.2% #28 1,910 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2026 29–17 63.0% #16 1,899 0 2 2021 1–2 33.3% #99 1,559 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2022 25–27 48.1% #43 1,751 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2023 30–26 53.6% #28 1,796 0 4
23 — — — — — — — 2024 30–26 53.6% #27 1,719 0 6
24 — — — — — — — 2025 17–24 41.5% #45 1,622 0 7
25 — — — — — — — 2026 21–23 47.7% #53 1,665 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Learner Tien Sebastian Baez
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2024 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2025 27 14 41 65.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2026 18 11 29 62.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2021 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 13 16 18.8% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 10 12 22 45.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 5 12 17 29.4% 25 11 36 69.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 3 12 15 20.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 10 10 20 50.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 48 29 77 62.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — 31 59 90 34.4% 90 60 150 60.0% 3 9 12 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 103/109 of Learner Tien's and 248/254 of Sebastian Baez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Learner Tien Sebastian Baez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2022 1/1 5.0 4.0 66.7% 66.2% 37.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.8% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2023 1/1 4.0 6.0 61.2% 53.5% 37.8% 68.0% 50.0% 47.4% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2024 5/5 2.8 1.8 68.7% 60.9% 59.0% 63.2% 34.4% 60.1% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2025 50/55 3.9 4.3 60.2% 68.3% 51.3% 62.8% 40.7% 61.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2026 46/47 6.0 4.3 63.0% 70.2% 51.0% 52.5% 42.9% 63.0% 38.7% 2021 2/3 0.5 1.0 75.0% 61.7% 50.0% 70.8% 54.2% 59.1% 45.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 52/52 1.7 2.0 71.9% 63.8% 52.2% 56.2% 38.8% 60.6% 38.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 56/56 2.1 1.6 71.9% 65.8% 53.5% 57.2% 43.0% 62.4% 39.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 53/56 2.2 2.0 72.0% 63.6% 50.9% 54.4% 43.2% 60.1% 39.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 41/41 1.7 1.9 72.0% 62.6% 47.8% 53.7% 41.7% 58.3% 39.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 44/46 1.8 1.9 70.6% 63.4% 50.4% 60.7% 43.3% 59.7% 37.8%
Career — 103/109 4.8 4.2 62.0% 68.6% 51.3% 58.1% 41.3% 61.9% 37.6% — 248/254 1.9 1.9 71.7% 63.9% 51.2% 56.5% 42.1% 60.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Learner Tien Sebastian Baez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2022 1496 106.9 +1.66 0.00 0.741 44.9% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2023 1480 110.3 -1.68 +2.67 0.642 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2024 1567 118.8 -1.17 +0.87 0.996 49.6% +23 — — 50.0% -0.07 2–0 1–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2025 1911 146.7 -1.79 +0.93 0.946 49.5% +10 -354 -269 54.1% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 17–10 (63%) 110.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2026 1900 153.1 -0.62 +3.13 1.048 50.8% +39 -149 -256 57.1% +0.35 13–6 (68%) 19–7 (73%) 113.1 +1.14 2021 1559 115.7 +0.21 -0.95 1.118 52.6% — +51 — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.21
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1751 144.0 -2.16 +2.01 0.976 49.3% -191 +146 -126 48.8% -0.07 11–8 (58%) 5–11 (31%) 99.7 -1.51
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1796 146.4 -1.09 +2.60 1.046 50.6% -125 +102 -217 52.3% +0.16 9–8 (53%) 7–13 (35%) 98.2 +1.76
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1719 142.5 -2.99 +2.61 0.986 49.9% -81 +207 -187 51.8% +0.06 11–10 (52%) 8–7 (53%) 98.2 +3.34
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1623 133.0 -4.38 +2.09 0.946 49.0% -63 +138 — 43.9% -0.35 8–11 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 96.2 +2.84
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1665 138.9 -3.91 +1.45 0.936 48.9% -19 +67 — 48.0% -0.36 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.25
Career — 1974 149.2 -1.20 +1.92 0.986 50.0% +22 -221 -264 54.3% +0.13 25–12 (68%) 37–18 (67%) 118.9 +0.39 — 1898 144.7 -2.75 +2.16 0.982 49.6% -95 +136 -172 49.3% -0.08 46–41 (53%) 31–36 (46%) 98.1 +2.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.