H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Leif Shiras vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 1-0
Leif Shiras holds a 1–0 lead over Pavel Slozil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leif Shiras leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leif Shiras won the 1985 Memphis second round 4-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1985* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Leif Shiras | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leif Shiras | #1,118 | #31 | 291 | 1,687 | 71 | 102 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leif Shiras | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #123 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |