H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leonardo Lavalle vs Bud Schultz H2H: 1-1
Leonardo Lavalle and Bud Schultz are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1986 Cincinnati second round 3-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1986* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leonardo Lavalle | 3-6 7-6 7-6 | Bud Schultz | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1985* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bud Schultz | 6-3 6-3 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bud Schultz | #1,057 | #40 | 0 | 1,773 | 47 | 54 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Lavalle | Bud Schultz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #43 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #233 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #527 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |