H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leonardo Lavalle vs Cassio Motta H2H: 0-1
Cassio Motta holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1986 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1986 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Cassio Motta | 6-4 6-4 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Lavalle | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |