H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leonardo Lavalle vs Chris Pridham H2H: 1-1
Leonardo Lavalle and Chris Pridham are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1992 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chris Pridham | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1991* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-4 7-6(3) | Chris Pridham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Lavalle | Chris Pridham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |