H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Leonardo Lavalle vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-0

Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1986 Forest Hills round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Damir Keretic
GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Lavalle #61 6-2 6-3 Damir Keretic #109 Match data May 7, 1986* R64 Forest Hills ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Damir Keretic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,476 0 0
22 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0
30 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Damir Keretic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 — — — — 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0% — 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Damir Keretic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54 1979 1496 100.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
20 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 105.5 -0.81 1980 1477 97.2 — — — — +53 +20 — 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.39
21 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.7 -0.27 1981 1477 122.8 — — — — — +42 — 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.85
22 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.85 1982 1618 125.5 — — — — — +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 103.9 +2.82
23 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 -0.14 1983 1528 123.9 — — — — -63 +44 — 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 96.0 +0.53
24 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 -0.27 1984 1574 127.4 — — — — — +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.03
25 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61 1985 1596 124.5 — — — — — +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 +1.43
26 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 1986 1688 134.4 — — — — -143 +52 — 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 111.3 -1.30
27 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25 1987 1694 139.5 — — — — -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) 103.2 -1.52
28 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04 1988 1538 120.7 — — — — -47 +102 — 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.6 -0.37
29 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10 1989 1576 113.3 — — — — -37 — — 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
30 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18 — 1741 133.5 — — — — -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.