H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Leonardo Lavalle vs Fernando Luna H2H: 1-0

Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1989 Italian Open round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Lavalle #76 6-3 3-6 6-3 Fernando Luna #73 Match data May 18, 1989* R32 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Fernando Luna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0
20 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0
21 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0
22 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0
24 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0
25 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0
26 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0
27 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0
28 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0
29 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0
30 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Fernando Luna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — —
24 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — —
26 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — —
27 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0% — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Fernando Luna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06
20 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 105.5 -0.81 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24
21 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.7 -0.27 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.7 +1.17
22 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.85 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -1.05
23 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 -0.14 1981 1695 133.6 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 98.7 +1.18
24 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 -0.27 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.9 -0.88
25 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +2.65
26 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -0.03
27 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.2 -1.21
28 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 +0.24
29 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15
30 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 96.1 +0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23
Career — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18 — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.