H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Leonardo Lavalle vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 1-0

Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1990 Australian Open round of 128 6-7 6-1 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Lavalle #135 6-7 6-1 6-4 6-2 Jeremy Bates #78 Match data Jan 17, 1990* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 45/57 of Leonardo Lavalle's and 106/126 of Jeremy Bates's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Jeremy Bates
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 5/8 8.4 1.8 69.1% 72.3% 55.8% 68.2% 35.6% 67.3% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 22/26 4.2 3.3 62.6% 68.3% 49.6% 50.5% 37.5% 61.5% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 10/13 3.3 4.3 58.3% 63.5% 43.6% 51.7% 46.9% 54.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 2/2 2.5 2.5 68.5% 56.6% 36.0% 33.9% 49.0% 50.2% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 2/3 4.0 7.5 51.2% 72.1% 40.7% 43.8% 45.0% 56.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 1/2 5.0 4.0 62.5% 61.8% 30.3% 68.8% 42.9% 50.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 1/1 7.0 5.0 59.5% 66.7% 46.9% 78.6% 60.0% 58.7% 33.7% 1991 7/9 3.1 3.3 61.5% 69.8% 53.1% 62.7% 33.5% 63.1% 35.3%
30 1998 2/2 1.5 4.0 69.1% 66.0% 50.7% 61.3% 31.0% 61.0% 41.1% 1992 17/19 3.9 3.8 60.0% 69.8% 42.1% 60.1% 47.3% 58.6% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 24/29 2.0 2.9 53.4% 64.7% 48.5% 50.3% 44.1% 57.3% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 26/32 4.0 4.7 52.9% 73.0% 48.2% 63.0% 46.0% 61.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/34 3.8 4.2 53.1% 68.6% 44.8% 45.6% 39.7% 57.2% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 4.5 5.5 57.5% 66.0% 46.0% 61.1% 14.3% 57.6% 32.1%
Career — 45/162 4.3 3.6 62.3% 67.1% 47.5% 53.2% 40.6% 59.6% 36.0% — 106/292 3.4 3.9 54.9% 69.0% 46.6% 54.7% 42.6% 58.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -1.10 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 105.5 -0.81 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.7 -0.27 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.85 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 -0.14 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +1.57
24 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 -0.27 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 99.4 +0.61
25 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 +0.46
26 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.6 +0.50
27 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +1.18
28 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.2 -0.28
29 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 +0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 102.6 +0.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 101.2 +1.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.