H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Leonardo Lavalle vs Ken Flach H2H: 0-1
Ken Flach holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Flach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Flach won the 1985 US Open first round 7-5 6-2 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ken Flach | 7-5 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Lavalle | Ken Flach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |