H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Leonardo Lavalle vs Mark Dickson H2H: 1-0
Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Dickson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1985 Hong Kong third round 7-6 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1985* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Leonardo Lavalle | 7-6 4-6 6-0 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Lavalle | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |