H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Leonardo Lavalle vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 3-1

Leonardo Lavalle holds a 3–1 lead over Ramesh Krishnan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1989 Australian Open round of 32 7-5 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leonardo Lavalle
MEX Age 59 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Ramesh Krishnan
IND Age 65 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Lavalle #74 7-5 6-4 3-6 6-3 Ramesh Krishnan Match data Jan 22, 1989* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Ramesh Krishnan 6-2 6-4 6-3 Leonardo Lavalle #70 Match data Aug 30, 1986* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Leonardo Lavalle #58 6-2 6-2 Ramesh Krishnan Match data May 15, 1986* R32 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Leonardo Lavalle #87 5-7 7-6 7-6 Ramesh Krishnan Match data Jan 29, 1986* R64 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leonardo Lavalle #968 #51 483 1,728 64 98 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ramesh Krishnan — — — 1,892 278 249 52.8% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Ramesh Krishnan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
17 1985 4–5 44.4% #87 1,558 0 0 1978 6–5 54.5% — 1,537 0 0
18 1986 10–17 37.0% #105 1,588 0 0 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,584 0 0
19 1987 2–9 18.2% #224 1,531 0 0 1980 14–11 56.0% — 1,713 0 0
20 1988 10–8 55.6% #64 1,654 0 0 1981 13–16 44.8% — 1,755 0 1
21 1989 11–15 42.3% #132 1,649 0 0 1982 22–23 48.9% — 1,741 0 2
22 1990 5–9 35.7% #183 1,596 0 0 1983 20–21 48.8% — 1,749 0 2
23 1991 5–3 62.5% #133 1,658 0 1 1984 31–19 62.0% — 1,842 0 3
24 1992 10–16 38.5% #99 1,645 0 1 1985 23–21 52.3% — 1,805 0 3
25 1993 4–9 30.8% #309 1,596 0 1 1986 29–22 56.9% — 1,845 0 5
26 1994 0–2 0.0% #213 1,568 0 1 1987 29–22 56.9% — 1,790 0 5
27 1995 1–2 33.3% #362 1,565 0 1 1988 28–15 65.1% — 1,757 0 6
28 1996 1–1 50.0% #313 1,570 0 1 1989 21–17 55.3% — 1,717 0 7
29 1997 0–1 0.0% #439 1,561 0 1 1990 20–21 48.8% — 1,698 0 8
30 1998 1–1 50.0% #400 1,569 0 1 1991 9–16 36.0% — 1,583 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 1992 4–5 44.4% — 1,616 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1993 2–2 50.0% — 1,639 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Ramesh Krishnan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 3 1 4 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1986 3 8 11 27.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1988 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 7 7 14 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 7 8 15 46.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1991 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 15 7 22 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1992 6 11 17 35.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1986 17 8 25 68.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 21 11 32 65.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 22 29 51 43.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 11 14 25 44.0% — 157 119 276 56.9% 33 53 86 38.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 46 44 90 51.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leonardo Lavalle Ramesh Krishnan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1486 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 1985 1558 126.7 — — — — +14 -9 — 44.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.29 1978 1537 115.0 — — — — +60 +16 — 54.5% +0.18 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.02
18 1986 1588 127.2 — — — — 0 -11 — 37.5% -1.03 7–5 (58%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.10 1979 1584 128.8 — — — — +55 -24 — 39.6% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.61
19 1987 1531 120.6 — — — — +31 +34 — 29.6% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.54 1980 1713 127.2 — — — — -22 -93 -153 50.8% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.73
20 1988 1654 137.9 — — — — +26 -94 — 41.5% -0.51 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.81 1981 1755 140.6 — — — — +40 -135 — 45.1% -0.38 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.22
21 1989 1649 126.6 — — — — +31 -56 — 47.0% -0.28 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.27 1982 1742 139.3 — — — — +1 -23 -190 47.3% -0.16 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.02
22 1990 1596 107.2 — — — — +43 -11 — 42.4% -0.52 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.85 1983 1749 145.4 — — — — +29 -115 -80 49.0% +0.04 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.76
23 1991 1658 122.7 +0.15 -1.21 1.022 50.1% +34 — — 50.0% -0.05 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.14 1984 1843 148.4 — — — — +35 -224 -106 58.9% +0.72 11–6 (65%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.71
24 1992 1646 122.6 -0.34 -1.80 0.915 48.1% -19 -9 -164 45.7% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.27 1985 1806 149.5 — — — — -2 — +12 50.5% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.37
25 1993 1596 111.1 -2.52 -2.49 0.792 45.9% +5 -12 — 25.8% -1.45 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.61 1986 1846 139.6 — — — — +4 -288 +69 58.3% +0.70 7–10 (41%) 4–8 (33%) — +1.08
26 1994 1568 101.6 -2.71 -1.42 0.785 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 1987 1790 139.1 — — — — +43 — +30 56.5% +0.43 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.98
27 1995 1566 110.6 +3.66 +0.68 0.964 49.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 1–0 — — -0.25 1988 1758 134.4 — — — — +24 — +34 60.2% +0.74 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.37
28 1996 1570 108.2 +1.19 -1.53 0.827 46.0% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.04 1989 1717 136.6 — — — — +43 — — 54.4% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.03
29 1997 1562 106.7 +1.45 -0.38 0.815 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10 1990 1699 138.1 — — — — +21 — +16 50.0% +0.07 8–10 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.38
30 1998 1570 108.2 +2.32 -0.20 1.053 50.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.06 1991 1583 123.4 — — — — -2 — — 41.0% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1616 131.3 — — — — +7 — — 40.9% -0.23 2–0 1–0 — -0.81
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1640 118.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.13 0–2 — — -0.39
Career — 1729 132.9 -0.51 -1.65 0.890 47.8% +14 -24 -164 40.7% -0.61 28–26 (52%) 24–29 (45%) 102.3 -2.18 — 1893 146.4 — — — — +22 -91 -23 52.1% +0.18 89–85 (51%) 69–75 (48%) 97.4 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.