H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Leonardo Lavalle vs Simon Youl H2H: 1-2
Simon Youl holds a 2–1 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Simon Youl leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1992 Washington second round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1992* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-4 7-6(3) | Simon Youl | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1992* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Simon Youl | 6-7(16) 7-5 7-5 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Simon Youl | 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-7 9-7 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Lavalle | Simon Youl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |