H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Leonardo Mayer vs Di Wu H2H: 1-0
Leonardo Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2014 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Leonardo Mayer | 6-4 6-1 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Leonardo Mayer | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |