H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Leonardo Mayer vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 2-1
Leonardo Mayer holds a 2–1 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-6(12) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Leonardo Mayer | 6-1 7-6(12) 6-2 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2010* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Leonardo Mayer | 7-5 6-4 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Mayer | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |