H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leonardo Mayer vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 0-1
Igor Sijsling holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Sijsling leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Sijsling won the 2013 Miami Masters first round 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Igor Sijsling | 3-2 (ret.) | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leonardo Mayer | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |