H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leonardo Mayer vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Leonardo Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2012 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Leonardo Mayer | 6-4 6-4 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Leonardo Mayer | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |