H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Leonardo Mayer vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0

Leonardo Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Mayer #54 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(5) Sergiy Stakhovsky #103 Match data Oct 8, 2017* Q1 Q Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #99 7-5 6-4 Leonardo Mayer #65 Match data Aug 12, 2012 Q2 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Leonardo Mayer #57 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2 Sergiy Stakhovsky #63 Match data May 26, 2010* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leonardo Mayer Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leonardo Mayer Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7% — — — — — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Leonardo Mayer Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8% 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9% 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5% 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
Career — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6% — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leonardo Mayer Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25
20 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41
21 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11
22 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41
23 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) — +1.40
24 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.67
25 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.79
26 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.40
27 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.19
28 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.26
29 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.06
30 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.26
31 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.83
32 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
33 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.66
34 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07 — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.