H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Andreas Maurer H2H: 2-0
Libor Pimek holds a 2–0 lead over Andreas Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1986 Rotterdam third round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1986* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Libor Pimek | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1985* | Vienna | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Libor Pimek | 6-3 6-2 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andreas Maurer | #1,008 | #24 | 12 | 1,821 | 114 | 138 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Andreas Maurer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #65 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #384 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |