H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 0-1
Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1984 Indianapolis semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1984 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |