H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Libor Pimek vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 0-1

Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1984 Indianapolis semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Libor Pimek
BEL Age 63 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Balazs Taroczy
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Balazs Taroczy #83 3-6 6-3 6-1 Libor Pimek #39 Match data Aug 11, 1984* SF Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Libor Pimek #1,308 #21 73 1,860 124 119 51.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,002 381 229 62.5% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Libor Pimek Balazs Taroczy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1972 4–3 57.1% — 1,564 0 0
19 1983 19–14 57.6% #57 1,679 0 0 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,554 0 0
20 1984 31–18 63.3% #25 1,765 0 1 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #34 1,785 0 1 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,822 0 1
22 1986 26–25 51.0% #71 1,693 0 1 1976 37–20 64.9% #31 1,849 0 2
23 1987 12–18 40.0% #95 1,659 0 1 1977 38–23 62.3% #31 1,852 0 2
24 1988 10–20 33.3% #234 1,563 0 1 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,908 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,814 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,930 0 9
27 1991 1–4 20.0% #332 1,531 0 1 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,939 0 11
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #742 1,517 0 1 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,864 0 13
29 — — — — — — — 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,783 0 13
30 — — — — — — — 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,751 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,645 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,642 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Libor Pimek Balazs Taroczy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1985 13 8 21 61.9% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
22 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 29 14 43 67.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1978 7 3 10 70.0% 33 10 43 76.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 32 13 45 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 2 7 71.4% 37 9 46 80.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 40 12 52 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 31 15 46 67.4% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 35 33 68 51.5% 74 63 137 54.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 21 36 41.7% — 38 35 73 52.1% 286 134 420 68.1% 14 13 27 51.9% 43 47 90 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Libor Pimek Balazs Taroczy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1565 121.5 — — — — — +57 — 52.6% +0.16 — 0–1 — +0.47
19 1983 1680 144.4 — — — — -76 +43 — 53.7% +0.38 6–4 (60%) 0–2 — +0.95 1973 1554 107.9 — — — — — +43 -20 38.9% -0.61 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.06
20 1984 1766 147.4 — — — — -132 +110 — 58.2% +0.51 7–3 (70%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.14 1974 1771 134.2 — — — — -88 +24 -193 59.8% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.47
21 1985 1786 142.2 — — — — -63 +23 — 54.2% +0.26 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.15 1975 1822 144.6 — — — — -131 +46 — 52.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.56
22 1986 1694 123.8 — — — — -33 +69 — 47.5% -0.46 10–4 (71%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.70 1976 1849 144.3 — — — — -88 +40 — 59.9% +0.80 12–6 (67%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.42
23 1987 1660 122.6 — — — — +56 -51 — 43.1% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.05 1977 1853 149.0 — — — — -90 +29 — 60.8% +0.85 7–10 (41%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.51
24 1988 1564 116.7 — — — — +89 -31 — 33.3% -1.07 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.74 1978 1908 153.4 — — — — -103 +93 — 65.6% +1.25 14–8 (64%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.19
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1814 149.3 — — — — -60 +157 -208 60.4% +0.93 12–7 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.25
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1931 156.3 — — — — -176 +80 -225 69.6% +1.32 9–6 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.18
27 1991 1531 106.0 -0.47 -0.21 0.902 47.9% +81 — — 27.3% -1.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.28 1981 1940 157.8 — — — — -191 +103 -216 67.1% +1.22 11–6 (65%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.14
28 1992 1518 97.8 +0.55 -1.38 0.649 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07 1982 1864 151.2 — — — — -49 +58 — 58.3% +0.42 19–8 (70%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.65
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1784 148.0 — — — — +17 +44 — 46.9% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1751 140.2 — — — — -22 +109 — 49.0% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.48
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1645 133.7 — — — — +37 +90 — 40.0% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1643 107.5 — — — — — +109 — 40.0% -0.40 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
Career — 1861 138.4 -0.27 -0.44 0.842 46.5% -26 +43 — 48.7% -0.17 41–26 (61%) 24–20 (55%) 109.7 -0.40 — 2002 154.5 — — — — -76 +76 -183 59.2% +0.68 108–73 (60%) 86–93 (48%) 99.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.