H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Christian Bergstrom H2H: 0-3
Christian Bergstrom holds a 3–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Christian Bergstrom leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Christian Bergstrom won the 1988 Bastad third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1988* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Christian Bergstrom | 6-3 6-1 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Christian Bergstrom | 6-1 6-4 6-1 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1987* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Christian Bergstrom | 7-5 2-6 6-1 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Christian Bergstrom | #1,327 | #32 | 876 | 1,867 | 159 | 164 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Christian Bergstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #410 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #69 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #106 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #80 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #112 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #259 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |