Libor Pimek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-0
Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1988 Miami Open round of 128 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | 6-2 6-1 3-6 6-7 6-4 | Damir Keretic | Match data | Mar 15, 1988* | R128 | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,741 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1985 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1983 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1987 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 74 | 63 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% | — | 9 | 21 | 30 | 30.0% | 66 | 82 | 148 | 44.6% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1983 | 1680 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +43 | — | 53.7% | +0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.95 | 1979 | 1496 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.86 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.34 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1766 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +110 | — | 58.2% | +0.51 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.14 | 1980 | 1477 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | +53 | +20 | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +1.39 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1786 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +23 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.15 | 1981 | 1477 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | 40.9% | -0.18 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.85 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1694 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +69 | — | 47.5% | -0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +1.70 | 1982 | 1618 | 125.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | -32 | 46.0% | -0.31 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +2.82 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1660 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -51 | — | 43.1% | -0.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.05 | 1983 | 1528 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +44 | — | 39.3% | -0.79 | 2–8 (20%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.53 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1564 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -31 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.74 | 1984 | 1574 | 127.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +56 | -12 | 43.8% | -0.56 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1596 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | -45 | 44.6% | -0.34 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +1.43 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1688 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -143 | +52 | — | 48.1% | -0.22 | 8–1 (89%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.30 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1531 | 106.0 | -0.47 | -0.21 | 0.902 | 47.9% | +81 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | 1987 | 1694 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -177 | +69 | -181 | 47.8% | -0.07 | 2–3 (40%) | 7–2 (78%) | — | -1.52 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1518 | 97.8 | +0.55 | -1.38 | 0.649 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 1988 | 1538 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -47 | +102 | — | 35.4% | -0.81 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.37 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1576 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | -37 | — | — | 52.9% | +0.24 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.44 |
| Career | — | 1861 | 138.4 | -0.27 | -0.44 | 0.842 | 46.5% | -26 | +43 | — | 48.7% | -0.17 | 41–26 (61%) | 24–20 (55%) | 109.7 | -0.40 | — | 1741 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +45 | -60 | 43.3% | -0.44 | 34–35 (49%) | 34–32 (52%) | 105.0 | +2.24 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Damir Keretic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Maurer | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 25, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 27, 1988 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 18, 1988 | H2H |
| Yannick Noah | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 12, 1988 | H2H |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3 | 1 | 4 | Sep 11, 1986 | H2H |