H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Libor Pimek vs David Pate H2H: 1-1
Libor Pimek and David Pate are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on carpet, while David Pate leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1986 Wembley quarterfinal 6-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1986* | Wembley | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Libor Pimek | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | David Pate | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1985* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | David Pate | 7-6 6-4 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |