Libor Pimek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Libor Pimek and David Pate are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on carpet, while David Pate leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1986 Wembley quarterfinal 6-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | David Pate | Match data | Nov 15, 1986* | QF | Wembley | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| David Pate | 7-6 6-4 | Libor Pimek | Match data | Feb 23, 1985* | SF | La Quinta | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,875 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Libor Pimek | David Pate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1984 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1985 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 24 | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1986 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1989 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 74 | 63 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% | — | 113 | 98 | 211 | 53.6% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 31 | 26 | 57 | 54.4% | 32 | 31 | 63 | 50.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Libor Pimek | David Pate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1983 | 1680 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +43 | — | 53.7% | +0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.95 | 1981 | 1494 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.08 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1766 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +110 | — | 58.2% | +0.51 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.14 | 1982 | 1485 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1786 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +23 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.15 | 1983 | 1529 | 119.4 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | +62 | 37.9% | -0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–8 (20%) | — | +0.28 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1694 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +69 | — | 47.5% | -0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +1.70 | 1984 | 1744 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -218 | -186 | 59.5% | +0.43 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.33 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1660 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -51 | — | 43.1% | -0.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.05 | 1985 | 1743 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -206 | -84 | 52.4% | +0.13 | 17–9 (65%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.85 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1564 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -31 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.74 | 1986 | 1788 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | -115 | 58.3% | +0.59 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +0.85 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1751 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | -55 | 61.5% | +0.54 | 6–11 (35%) | 18–11 (62%) | — | -0.04 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1716 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | -25 | 52.7% | +0.32 | 7–5 (58%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.56 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1531 | 106.0 | -0.47 | -0.21 | 0.902 | 47.9% | +81 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | 1989 | 1656 | 135.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | +63 | 35.5% | -1.12 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | -2.42 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1518 | 97.8 | +0.55 | -1.38 | 0.649 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 1990 | 1658 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | +129 | 50.6% | +0.33 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | +0.85 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1596 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -112 | +179 | 40.3% | -0.61 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -0.86 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1574 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.43 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1548 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.78 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1561 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.20 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1542 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| Career | — | 1861 | 138.4 | -0.27 | -0.44 | 0.842 | 46.5% | -26 | +43 | — | 48.7% | -0.17 | 41–26 (61%) | 24–20 (55%) | 109.7 | -0.40 | — | 1875 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -183 | -21 | 50.8% | +0.06 | 62–57 (52%) | 73–84 (46%) | 98.7 | -0.49 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | 5 | 5 | 10 | Sep 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 7 | 9 | Oct 10, 1991 | H2H |
| Larry Stefanki | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 27, 1986 | H2H |
| Wally Masur | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 8, 1992 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 15, 1991 | H2H |