H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Libor Pimek vs Fernando Luna H2H: 2-0

Libor Pimek holds a 2–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1986 Hamburg Open round of 64 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Libor Pimek

BEL Age 63 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"

H2H

2 – 0

2 main-draw meetings

Fernando Luna

ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Libor Pimek #48	7-6 6-3	Fernando Luna #45	Match data	Sep 17, 1986*	R64	Hamburg Open	ATP 250	Clay
Libor Pimek #28	6-1 6-4	Fernando Luna #115	Match data	Jul 18, 1985*	R32	Washington Open	ATP 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Libor Pimek	#1,308	#21	73	1,860	124	119	51.0%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Fernando Luna	#723	#33	310	1,779	167	160	51.1%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Libor Pimek							Fernando Luna
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
19	1983	19–14	57.6%	#57	1,679	0	0	1977	1–1	50.0%	#322	1,511	0	0
20	1984	31–18	63.3%	#25	1,765	0	1	1978	2–2	50.0%	#340	1,541	0	0
21	1985	25–19	56.8%	#34	1,785	0	1	1979	5–9	35.7%	#87	1,517	0	0
22	1986	26–25	51.0%	#71	1,693	0	1	1980	18–13	58.1%	#66	1,708	0	0
23	1987	12–18	40.0%	#95	1,659	0	1	1981	17–15	53.1%	#81	1,694	0	0
24	1988	10–20	33.3%	#234	1,563	0	1	1982	23–18	56.1%	#60	1,724	0	0
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	19–13	59.4%	#53	1,733	0	0
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	12–14	46.2%	#70	1,646	0	0
27	1991	1–4	20.0%	#332	1,531	0	1	1985	10–14	41.7%	#111	1,620	0	0
28	1992	0–1	0.0%	#742	1,517	0	1	1986	19–14	57.6%	#52	1,690	0	0
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	4–6	40.0%	#261	1,644	0	0
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	18–12	60.0%	#59	1,705	0	0
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	11–16	40.7%	#135	1,566	0	0
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	8–10	44.4%	#110	1,588	0	0
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	0–3	0.0%	#356	1,535	0	0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Libor Pimek																	Fernando Luna
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
19	1983	3	3	6	50.0%	14	8	22	63.6%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1977	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1984	6	6	12	50.0%	23	10	33	69.7%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	1978	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1985	13	8	21	61.9%	12	10	22	54.5%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1979	—	—	—	—	5	9	14	35.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1986	5	7	12	41.7%	15	12	27	55.6%	—	—	—	—	6	6	12	50.0%	1980	—	—	—	—	18	13	31	58.1%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1987	4	3	7	57.1%	4	11	15	26.7%	—	—	—	—	4	4	8	50.0%	1981	—	—	—	—	17	15	32	53.1%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1988	4	5	9	44.4%	5	10	15	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	1982	—	—	—	—	23	18	41	56.1%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	—	—	—	—	19	13	32	59.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	—	—	—	—	12	14	26	46.2%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1991	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	1985	—	—	—	—	10	14	24	41.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1992	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	—	—	—	—	19	14	33	57.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	—	—	—	—	4	6	10	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	—	—	—	—	18	11	29	62.1%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	—	—	—	—	11	15	26	42.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	—	—	—	—	8	10	18	44.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	35	33	68	51.5%	74	63	137	54.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	15	21	36	41.7%	—	0	1	1	0.0%	167	157	324	51.5%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Libor Pimek																Fernando Luna
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
19	1983	1680	144.4	—	—	—	—	-76	+43	—	53.7%	+0.38	6–4 (60%)	0–2	—	+0.95	1977	1512	110.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	+0.75	—	—	—	+0.06
20	1984	1766	147.4	—	—	—	—	-132	+110	—	58.2%	+0.51	7–3 (70%)	5–2 (71%)	107.3	-1.14	1978	1541	122.3	—	—	—	—	—	+41	—	60.0%	+1.10	0–2	—	—	-0.24
21	1985	1786	142.2	—	—	—	—	-63	+23	—	54.2%	+0.26	10–6 (63%)	8–6 (57%)	105.5	-2.15	1979	1517	119.6	—	—	—	—	—	+31	—	43.3%	-0.23	1–3 (25%)	1–4 (20%)	95.7	+1.17
22	1986	1694	123.8	—	—	—	—	-33	+69	—	47.5%	-0.46	10–4 (71%)	4–7 (36%)	101.9	+1.70	1980	1708	148.6	—	—	—	—	—	+22	—	54.3%	+0.33	5–3 (63%)	3–1 (75%)	104.7	-1.05
23	1987	1660	122.6	—	—	—	—	+56	-51	—	43.1%	-0.79	3–4 (43%)	4–1 (80%)	101.4	+0.05	1981	1695	133.6	—	—	—	—	—	+19	—	49.4%	+0.10	10–6 (63%)	2–7 (22%)	98.7	+1.18
24	1988	1564	116.7	—	—	—	—	+89	-31	—	33.3%	-1.07	5–4 (56%)	3–1 (75%)	101.6	-0.74	1982	1725	145.1	—	—	—	—	—	+18	—	52.7%	+0.30	4–4 (50%)	5–4 (56%)	100.9	-0.88
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	1733	134.9	—	—	—	—	—	+26	—	57.7%	+0.86	7–3 (70%)	2–2 (50%)	101.7	+2.65
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	1647	140.1	—	—	—	—	—	+41	—	47.5%	+0.34	3–4 (43%)	1–5 (17%)	94.7	-0.03
27	1991	1531	106.0	-0.47	-0.21	0.902	47.9%	+81	—	—	27.3%	-1.45	0–1	0–1	—	+0.28	1985	1620	133.2	—	—	—	—	—	+19	—	42.4%	-0.15	5–4 (56%)	3–6 (33%)	99.2	-1.21
28	1992	1518	97.8	+0.55	-1.38	0.649	40.7%	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.07	1986	1691	141.4	—	—	—	—	—	+38	—	57.5%	+0.71	4–5 (44%)	5–6 (45%)	98.6	+0.24
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	1644	114.7	—	—	—	—	—	+31	—	40.0%	-1.10	—	1–0	—	-0.15
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	1706	136.6	—	—	—	—	—	+48	—	58.7%	+0.56	1–1	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.63
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	1566	117.8	—	—	—	—	—	+22	—	46.0%	-0.14	2–5 (29%)	6–4 (60%)	96.1	+0.28
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	1588	130.6	—	—	—	—	—	+37	—	43.9%	0.00	2–2 (50%)	1–5 (17%)	97.5	-0.14
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	1536	93.3	-2.58	+0.12	0.731	42.6%	—	—	—	12.5%	-2.88	0–1	1–1	—	+0.23
Career	—	1861	138.4	-0.27	-0.44	0.842	46.5%	-26	+43	—	48.7%	-0.17	41–26 (61%)	24–20 (55%)	109.7	-0.40	—	1779	144.3	-2.58	+0.12	0.731	42.6%	—	+29	—	50.7%	+0.24	44–43 (51%)	32–47 (41%)	93.6	+0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Libor Pimek's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Martin Jaite	2	4	6	Mar 16, 1988	H2H
Thierry Tulasne	2	4	6	Jul 16, 1987	H2H
Pavel Slozil	5	1	6	Nov 22, 1985	H2H
Mats Wilander	0	5	5	Sep 7, 1987	H2H
Aaron Krickstein	1	3	4	Oct 23, 1991	H2H

Fernando Luna's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Andres Gomez	0	6	6	May 30, 1990	H2H
Balazs Taroczy	0	5	5	Sep 18, 1982	H2H
Thierry Tulasne	0	4	4	Aug 23, 1990	H2H
Francesco Cancellotti	2	2	4	Sep 14, 1988	H2H
Aaron Krickstein	1	3	4	May 5, 1988	H2H