Libor Pimek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Gabriel Urpi H2H: 1-0
Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Gabriel Urpi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1984 Munich Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | 6-3 6-2 | Gabriel Urpi | Match data | May 18, 1984* | R16 | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gabriel Urpi | #1,122 | #115 | 0 | 1,618 | 43 | 67 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Gabriel Urpi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #115 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #274 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Gabriel Urpi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 19 | 30 | 36.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 74 | 63 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 42 | 65 | 107 | 39.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Gabriel Urpi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1491 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1552 | 119.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | 45.5% | -0.86 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.25 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1601 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | 44.1% | -0.32 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–1 | — | +0.35 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1680 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +43 | — | 53.7% | +0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.95 | 1981 | 1592 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | 40.3% | -0.63 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.21 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1766 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +110 | — | 58.2% | +0.51 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.14 | 1982 | 1535 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | 33.3% | -1.04 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.57 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1786 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +23 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.15 | 1983 | 1514 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | 33.3% | -1.25 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1694 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +69 | — | 47.5% | -0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +1.70 | 1984 | 1529 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | 43.8% | -0.56 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +1.48 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1660 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -51 | — | 43.1% | -0.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.05 | 1985 | 1533 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | 37.8% | -1.00 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.07 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1564 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -31 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1565 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | 60.0% | -0.10 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.58 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1531 | 106.0 | -0.47 | -0.21 | 0.902 | 47.9% | +81 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 1518 | 97.8 | +0.55 | -1.38 | 0.649 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1861 | 138.4 | -0.27 | -0.44 | 0.842 | 46.5% | -26 | +43 | — | 48.7% | -0.17 | 41–26 (61%) | 24–20 (55%) | 109.7 | -0.40 | — | 1619 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | 41.0% | -0.72 | 15–21 (42%) | 5–9 (36%) | 96.9 | +2.75 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Gabriel Urpi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Fernando Luna | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 27, 1983 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 21, 1982 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 8, 1985 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 25, 1985 | H2H |