H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Libor Pimek vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 0-2

Jimmy Connors holds a 2–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1988 Rotterdam fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Libor Pimek
BEL Age 62 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 1988* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jimmy Connors #5 6-2 6-3 Libor Pimek #98 Match data
Nov 2, 1984* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #2 6-4 6-2 Libor Pimek #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Libor Pimek #1,308 #21 73 1,860 124 119 51.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Libor Pimek Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1983 19–14 57.6% #57 1,678 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1984 31–18 63.3% #25 1,764 0 1 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #34 1,784 0 1 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1986 26–25 51.0% #71 1,693 0 1 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1987 12–18 40.0% #95 1,659 0 1 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1988 10–20 33.3% #234 1,563 0 1 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 — — — — — — — 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 — — — — — — — 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1991 1–4 20.0% #332 1,530 0 1 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #742 1,517 0 1 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 — — — — — — — 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109