H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Libor Pimek vs John Frawley H2H: 1-0

Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over John Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1984 Munich Open semifinal 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Libor Pimek
BEL Age 63 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
John Frawley
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Libor Pimek #52 6-3 6-0 John Frawley Match data May 19, 1984* SF Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Libor Pimek #1,308 #21 73 1,860 124 119 51.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
John Frawley — — — 1,834 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Libor Pimek John Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1983 19–14 57.6% #57 1,679 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 31–18 63.3% #25 1,765 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #34 1,785 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1986 26–25 51.0% #71 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1987 12–18 40.0% #95 1,659 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1988 10–20 33.3% #234 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1991 1–4 20.0% #332 1,531 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #742 1,517 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Libor Pimek John Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 13 8 21 61.9% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1988 24 17 41 58.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 1 10 11 9.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 33 68 51.5% 74 63 137 54.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 21 36 41.7% — 37 40 77 48.1% 13 14 27 48.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Libor Pimek John Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1498 117.6 — — — — +69 — -4 29.4% -1.82 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.57
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1458 107.7 — — — — +83 — -2 34.8% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +0.76
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1654 130.9 — — — — -37 -1 -122 55.6% +0.50 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 +2.33
19 1983 1680 144.4 — — — — -76 +43 — 53.7% +0.38 6–4 (60%) 0–2 — +0.95 1985 1647 127.7 — — — — -70 +1 -45 46.1% -0.25 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 98.1 +0.15
20 1984 1766 147.4 — — — — -132 +110 — 58.2% +0.51 7–3 (70%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 1786 142.2 — — — — -63 +23 — 54.2% +0.26 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 105.5 -2.15 1987 1702 119.0 — — — — -91 — -89 52.4% +0.24 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.65
22 1986 1694 123.8 — — — — -33 +69 — 47.5% -0.46 10–4 (71%) 4–7 (36%) 101.9 +1.70 1988 1738 138.5 — — — — -14 — — 51.3% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 9–10 (47%) 100.0 -0.66
23 1987 1660 122.6 — — — — +56 -51 — 43.1% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 101.4 +0.05 1989 1536 106.2 — — — — -2 +103 — 28.6% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 +0.38
24 1988 1564 116.7 — — — — +89 -31 — 33.3% -1.07 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1531 106.0 -0.47 -0.21 0.902 47.9% +81 — — 27.3% -1.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1518 97.8 +0.55 -1.38 0.649 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 138.4 -0.27 -0.44 0.842 46.5% -26 +43 — 48.7% -0.17 41–26 (61%) 24–20 (55%) 109.7 -0.40 — 1835 132.6 — — — — -21 +22 -66 46.5% -0.24 17–25 (40%) 27–27 (50%) 95.8 +1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.