H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Libor Pimek vs Jose Lopez Maeso H2H: 1-0

Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Jose Lopez Maeso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1985 Indianapolis round of 64 4-6 6-2 9-7.

BEL Age 63 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Libor Pimek #27 4-6 6-2 9-7 Jose Lopez Maeso Match data Jul 24, 1985* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Libor Pimek #1,308 #21 73 1,860 124 119 51.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jose Lopez Maeso 1,716 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Libor Pimek Jose Lopez Maeso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1983 19–14 57.6% #57 1,679 0 0
20 1984 31–18 63.3% #25 1,765 0 1
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #34 1,785 0 1
22 1986 26–25 51.0% #71 1,693 0 1
23 1987 12–18 40.0% #95 1,659 0 1
24 1988 10–20 33.3% #234 1,563 0 1
27 1991 1–4 20.0% #332 1,531 0 1
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #742 1,517 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Libor Pimek Jose Lopez Maeso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 23 10 33 69.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1985 13 8 21 61.9% 12 10 22 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 4 11 15 26.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1983 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
31 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 35 33 68 51.5% 74 63 137 54.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 21 36 41.7% 8 11 19 42.1% 43 66 109 39.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Libor Pimek Jose Lopez Maeso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1983 1680 144.4 -76 +43 53.7% +0.38 6–4 (60%) 0–2 +0.95
20 1984 1766 147.4 -132 +110 58.2% +0.51 7–3 (70%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.14
21 1985 1786 142.2 -63 +23 54.2% +0.26 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 105.5 -2.15
22 1986 1694 123.8 -33 +69 47.5% -0.46 10–4 (71%) 4–7 (36%) 101.9 +1.70 1979 1461 99.5 +28 26.7% -1.47 0–1 1–1 +0.42
23 1987 1660 122.6 +56 -51 43.1% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 101.4 +0.05 1980 1519 121.9 +78 -53 33.3% -1.33 1–0 0–1 -0.24
24 1988 1564 116.7 +89 -31 33.3% -1.07 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.74 1981 1701 141.0 -74 -16 46.3% -0.55 10–4 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 109.1 -1.31
25 1982 1692 135.5 -97 +24 -175 47.6% +0.01 6–4 (60%) 1–12 (8%) 95.0 -0.51
26 1983 1595 98.2 +9 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–1 +0.64
27 1991 1531 106.0 -0.47 -0.21 0.902 47.9% +81 27.3% -1.45 0–1 0–1 +0.28 1984 1592 117.6 +5 35.7% -0.36 1–1 0–2 -0.01
28 1992 1518 97.8 +0.55 -1.38 0.649 40.7% 0.0% -4.00 +0.07 1985 1547 122.2 +19 39.1% -0.54 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.14
29 1986 1510 114.2 +25 38.6% -0.36 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +1.58
30 1987 1494 105.9 +92 +6 46.7% -0.60 0–3 (0%) +0.79
31 1988 1492 99.3 40.0% -0.40 1–0 +0.50
32 1989 1486 100.4 0.0% -4.50 -0.10
Career 1861 138.4 -0.27 -0.44 0.842 46.5% -26 +43 48.7% -0.17 41–26 (61%) 24–20 (55%) 109.7 -0.40 1716 132.4 -22 +9 -175 41.1% -0.53 23–21 (52%) 6–26 (19%) 94.8 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.