H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Libor Pimek vs Lawson Duncan H2H: 1-0

Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Lawson Duncan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1986 Munich Open round of 32 6-1 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Libor Pimek
BEL Age 63 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lawson Duncan
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Libor Pimek #51 6-1 6-7 6-4 Lawson Duncan #83 Match data May 8, 1986* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Libor Pimek #1,308 #21 73 1,860 124 119 51.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lawson Duncan #1,094 #47 317 1,761 105 110 48.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Libor Pimek Lawson Duncan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1983 19–14 57.6% #57 1,679 0 0 1984 4–5 44.4% #165 1,537 0 0
20 1984 31–18 63.3% #25 1,765 0 1 1985 26–19 57.8% #59 1,624 0 0
21 1985 25–19 56.8% #34 1,785 0 1 1986 11–18 37.9% #174 1,570 0 0
22 1986 26–25 51.0% #71 1,693 0 1 1987 6–9 40.0% #93 1,565 0 0
23 1987 12–18 40.0% #95 1,659 0 1 1988 21–17 55.3% #58 1,658 0 0
24 1988 10–20 33.3% #234 1,563 0 1 1989 25–22 53.2% #91 1,672 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1990 12–18 40.0% #143 1,589 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #432 1,565 0 0
27 1991 1–4 20.0% #332 1,531 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #742 1,517 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Libor Pimek Lawson Duncan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 25 15 40 62.5% — — — — — — — —
21 1985 13 8 21 61.9% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
23 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 23 17 40 57.5% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 33 68 51.5% 74 63 137 54.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 21 36 41.7% — 9 24 33 27.3% 93 79 172 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Libor Pimek Lawson Duncan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1983 1680 144.4 — — — — -76 +43 — 53.7% +0.38 6–4 (60%) 0–2 — +0.95 1984 1538 118.7 — — — — +16 +33 — 42.1% -0.84 — 1–0 — +0.04
20 1984 1766 147.4 — — — — -132 +110 — 58.2% +0.51 7–3 (70%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.14 1985 1625 135.4 — — — — -112 +56 — 55.2% +0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) — +2.39
21 1985 1786 142.2 — — — — -63 +23 — 54.2% +0.26 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.15 1986 1570 128.6 — — — — -55 +57 — 45.6% -0.35 1–8 (11%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.35
22 1986 1694 123.8 — — — — -33 +69 — 47.5% -0.46 10–4 (71%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.70 1987 1566 120.6 — — — — — +69 — 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.50
23 1987 1660 122.6 — — — — +56 -51 — 43.1% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.05 1988 1658 128.6 — — — — -200 +59 — 52.4% +0.15 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.27
24 1988 1564 116.7 — — — — +89 -31 — 33.3% -1.07 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.74 1989 1672 132.8 — — — — -181 +42 — 52.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.78
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1590 119.9 — — — — -91 +107 — 38.8% -1.07 2–4 (33%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.13
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1565 95.6 +0.82 -1.98 0.695 44.0% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.06
27 1991 1531 106.0 -0.47 -0.21 0.902 47.9% +81 — — 27.3% -1.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1518 97.8 +0.55 -1.38 0.649 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 138.4 -0.27 -0.44 0.842 46.5% -26 +43 — 48.7% -0.17 41–26 (61%) 24–20 (55%) 109.7 -0.40 — 1762 133.6 +0.82 -1.98 0.695 44.0% -107 +60 — 48.9% -0.13 20–27 (43%) 31–17 (65%) 102.7 +3.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.