H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Matt Mitchell H2H: 1-0
Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Matt Mitchell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1983 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1983* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Libor Pimek | 6-3 6-2 | Matt Mitchell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Matt Mitchell | #920 | #53 | 0 | 1,717 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Matt Mitchell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #196 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #239 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #96 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #85 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #799 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |