Libor Pimek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Libor Pimek holds a 2–0 lead over Sammy Giammalva Jr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1984 Columbus quarterfinal 4-6 7-6 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | 4-6 7-6 3-0 (ret.) | Sammy Giammalva Jr | Match data | Aug 18, 1984* | QF | Columbus | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Libor Pimek | 6-3 7-5 | Sammy Giammalva Jr | Match data | Jul 9, 1983* | QF | Swiss Open Gstaad | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sammy Giammalva Jr | — | — | — | 1,803 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Sammy Giammalva Jr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Sammy Giammalva Jr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 19 | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1982 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 20 | 1984 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1983 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 21 | 1985 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1984 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1985 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 23 | 1987 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1986 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 24 | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1987 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| 27 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 35 | 33 | 68 | 51.5% | 74 | 63 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% | — | 69 | 68 | 137 | 50.4% | 25 | 32 | 57 | 43.9% | 24 | 23 | 47 | 51.1% | 26 | 29 | 55 | 47.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Sammy Giammalva Jr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1608 | 127.7 | — | — | — | — | +76 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.03 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–0 | — | +0.70 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1672 | 132.0 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -93 | — | 50.0% | -0.02 | 15–10 (60%) | 8–8 (50%) | 103.8 | +2.44 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1680 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +43 | — | 53.7% | +0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.95 | 1982 | 1623 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -90 | +29 | 41.3% | -0.35 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–7 (30%) | 94.9 | +1.50 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1766 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +110 | — | 58.2% | +0.51 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.3 | -1.14 | 1983 | 1701 | 132.6 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -112 | -28 | 53.3% | -0.09 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–4 (67%) | 103.1 | +2.18 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1786 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +23 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 105.5 | -2.15 | 1984 | 1715 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -117 | +2 | 47.1% | -0.23 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–3 (50%) | 105.8 | -0.79 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1694 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +69 | — | 47.5% | -0.46 | 10–4 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | 101.9 | +1.70 | 1985 | 1737 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | +16 | 50.6% | +0.04 | 3–2 (60%) | 8–3 (73%) | 106.1 | -0.64 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1660 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -51 | — | 43.1% | -0.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.4 | +0.05 | 1986 | 1740 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -120 | -6 | 48.8% | +0.15 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | -1.68 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1564 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +89 | -31 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.6 | -0.74 | 1987 | 1644 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -40 | +94 | 43.4% | -0.45 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.9 | +0.11 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1653 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -43 | +53 | 51.8% | +0.13 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.8 | +0.72 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1582 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | +68 | — | +50 | 35.9% | -0.54 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–3 (0%) | 96.8 | +0.53 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1531 | 106.0 | -0.47 | -0.21 | 0.902 | 47.9% | +81 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 1518 | 97.8 | +0.55 | -1.38 | 0.649 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1861 | 138.4 | -0.27 | -0.44 | 0.842 | 46.5% | -26 | +43 | — | 48.7% | -0.17 | 41–26 (61%) | 24–20 (55%) | 109.7 | -0.40 | — | 1804 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -94 | +29 | 48.1% | -0.11 | 55–47 (54%) | 44–41 (52%) | 103.6 | +1.72 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Thierry Tulasne | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Pavel Slozil | 5 | 1 | 6 | Nov 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Aaron Krickstein | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 23, 1991 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Davis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 9, 1987 | — |
| Bill Scanlon | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 15, 1989 | — |
| Tim Mayotte | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 3, 1987 | — |
| Jimmy Connors | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 20, 1986 | — |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 28, 1986 | — |