H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Victor Pecci H2H: 1-0
Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1985 La Quinta second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1985* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Libor Pimek | 6-4 6-4 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Libor Pimek | Victor Pecci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 |