H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Libor Pimek vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 2-1
Libor Pimek holds a 2–1 lead over Wojtek Fibak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1986 Rotterdam fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1986* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 7-5 6-3 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1986* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Libor Pimek | 6-4 7-5 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| May 11, 1984* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Libor Pimek | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Libor Pimek | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |