Lionel Roux
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 8, 1999 | H2H |
| Petr Korda | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 4, 1997 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 19, 1997 | — |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 15, 2002 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Lionel Roux vs David Rikl H2H: 1-0
Lionel Roux holds a 1–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lionel Roux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lionel Roux won the 1994 Swiss Indoors round of 32 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lionel Roux | 6-2 6-1 | David Rikl | Match data | Sep 29, 1994* | R32 | Swiss Indoors | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lionel Roux | #975 | #48 | 808 | 1,727 | 76 | 116 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,687 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lionel Roux | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #96 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #101 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #255 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #559 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lionel Roux | David Rikl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1994 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1993 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1996 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1994 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 24 | 1997 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1995 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 1998 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1996 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 53 | 68 | 121 | 43.8% | 7 | 17 | 24 | 29.2% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 16 | 25 | 41 | 39.0% | — | 13 | 32 | 45 | 28.9% | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 157/192 of Lionel Roux's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lionel Roux | David Rikl | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 1992 | 3/5 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 55.5% | 69.0% | 63.2% | 20.8% | 30.6% | 66.7% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 52.2% | 59.2% | 31.1% | 29.2% | 66.7% | 45.7% | 29.1% | 1991 | 2/4 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 58.4% | 69.4% | 48.3% | 66.3% | 33.3% | 60.9% | 31.4% |
| 21 | 1994 | 23/28 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 54.9% | 68.8% | 50.5% | 61.3% | 43.2% | 60.7% | 36.4% | 1992 | 11/12 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 55.8% | 61.4% | 43.4% | 57.2% | 40.8% | 53.2% | 40.0% |
| 22 | 1995 | 34/43 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 56.1% | 68.6% | 54.4% | 63.6% | 46.4% | 62.3% | 34.6% | 1993 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 56.0% | 64.5% | 45.1% | 51.7% | 47.0% | 56.1% | 36.7% |
| 23 | 1996 | 30/33 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 56.7% | 71.0% | 48.2% | 53.8% | 41.5% | 60.9% | 36.0% | 1994 | 43/47 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 56.8% | 64.9% | 49.0% | 55.1% | 40.8% | 58.2% | 35.4% |
| 24 | 1997 | 36/42 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 57.7% | 68.1% | 47.0% | 51.3% | 43.3% | 59.0% | 36.2% | 1995 | 20/20 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 53.3% | 67.9% | 49.0% | 55.8% | 44.4% | 59.4% | 39.0% |
| 25 | 1998 | 15/18 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 69.6% | 46.3% | 62.3% | 40.5% | 59.6% | 33.4% | 1996 | 27/31 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 58.8% | 64.2% | 45.1% | 56.8% | 40.0% | 56.5% | 36.7% |
| 26 | 1999 | 2/6 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 52.4% | 63.5% | 54.3% | 62.5% | 48.5% | 59.1% | 42.8% | 1997 | 7/7 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 55.2% | 67.9% | 44.5% | 60.4% | 56.0% | 57.4% | 39.2% |
| 27 | 2000 | 6/8 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 57.5% | 70.8% | 53.4% | 50.1% | 39.6% | 62.5% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 52.7% | 65.3% | 35.4% | 41.7% | 28.3% | 51.4% | 35.5% | 1999 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 53.4% | 82.1% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 66.7% | 67.1% | 34.9% |
| 29 | 2002 | 2/3 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 60.6% | 74.4% | 52.4% | 58.3% | 50.0% | 65.8% | 21.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 157/192 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 56.4% | 68.9% | 49.4% | 55.9% | 43.5% | 60.3% | 35.5% | — | 129/145 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 56.4% | 65.2% | 46.9% | 55.6% | 43.0% | 57.4% | 36.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lionel Roux | David Rikl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1504 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1548 | 131.1 | +0.92 | +0.58 | 1.202 | 52.0% | +14 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.69 | 1990 | 1492 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1507 | 96.5 | -3.31 | -2.76 | 0.536 | 38.1% | +13 | — | — | 10.0% | -3.20 | — | — | — | -0.08 | 1991 | 1474 | 99.3 | -0.87 | -1.37 | 0.804 | 47.8% | +55 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.56 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1657 | 139.6 | -0.98 | -0.71 | 0.928 | 49.0% | +13 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.36 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +0.42 | 1992 | 1503 | 110.9 | -3.14 | -0.80 | 0.856 | 47.2% | — | +80 | — | 41.4% | -0.90 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | +0.71 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1559 | 127.6 | +0.67 | -2.83 | 0.918 | 49.0% | +40 | -46 | — | 41.3% | -0.49 | 3–9 (25%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +0.01 | 1993 | 1532 | 121.2 | -2.57 | -0.92 | 0.837 | 46.7% | -53 | +80 | — | 37.0% | -1.04 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.11 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1651 | 134.0 | -0.24 | -0.63 | 0.922 | 48.5% | +12 | -132 | — | 44.3% | -0.35 | 8–9 (47%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.05 | 1994 | 1536 | 126.2 | -2.08 | -2.48 | 0.847 | 47.1% | -44 | +135 | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | +0.69 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1690 | 136.1 | -1.99 | -0.80 | 0.883 | 47.9% | +17 | -125 | -164 | 43.6% | -0.48 | 7–6 (54%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -1.26 | 1995 | 1534 | 123.3 | -1.30 | -0.19 | 0.959 | 49.3% | -48 | +102 | — | 42.0% | -0.48 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.78 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1569 | 114.5 | -0.91 | -3.18 | 0.827 | 47.1% | +6 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.78 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +1.15 | 1996 | 1529 | 123.0 | -3.53 | -0.97 | 0.843 | 46.6% | -13 | +41 | — | 39.0% | -0.89 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +0.07 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1557 | 108.6 | +0.65 | +1.25 | 1.047 | 50.7% | +21 | — | — | 38.5% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.24 | 1997 | 1578 | 115.2 | -1.18 | +1.34 | 0.921 | 48.9% | -56 | — | +29 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.27 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1582 | 117.3 | +0.22 | +1.83 | 1.062 | 51.1% | +21 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.75 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1534 | 99.8 | -4.68 | +1.86 | 0.730 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.03 | 1999 | 1565 | 98.3 | -0.24 | +1.75 | 1.063 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1544 | 109.5 | -3.49 | +0.65 | 0.631 | 44.1% | +31 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 1529 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1728 | 134.6 | -0.74 | -1.27 | 0.895 | 48.2% | +20 | -96 | -164 | 42.6% | -0.49 | 26–37 (41%) | 33–39 (46%) | 98.9 | -0.36 | — | 1687 | 125.9 | -2.34 | -1.19 | 0.867 | 47.4% | -37 | +85 | +29 | 39.5% | -0.81 | 15–30 (33%) | 19–25 (43%) | 91.8 | +2.03 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
David Rikl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 29, 1994 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |