H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 2-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 2–1 lead over Agustin Calleri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2007 US Open second round 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-2.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
ARG Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Agustin Calleri #58 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #16 Match data
May 16, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-3 6-4 Agustin Calleri #28 Match data
Jan 7, 2005* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 6-1 6-4 Agustin Calleri #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Agustin Calleri #894 #16 1,405 1,902 199 182 52.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Agustin Calleri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1999 3–3 50.0% #140 1,537 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2000 11–5 68.8% #62 1,752 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2001 11–16 40.7% #67 1,659 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2002 25–23 52.1% #50 1,722 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2003 33–23 58.9% #24 1,726 0 1
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2004 19–17 52.8% #58 1,690 0 1
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2005 21–21 50.0% #51 1,665 0 1
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2006 30–19 61.2% #29 1,800 0 2
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2007 23–24 48.9% #42 1,736 0 2
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2008 20–21 48.8% #60 1,654 0 2
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2009 3–10 23.1% #391 1,576 0 2
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30