H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Albert Costa H2H: 4-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 4–1 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2005 US Open first round 6-1 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Albert Costa
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #4 6-1 6-2 6-1 Albert Costa #104 Match data
Nov 11, 2002 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-2 4-6 6-3 Albert Costa #11 Match data
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #8 6-2 5-7 6-1 Albert Costa #34 Match data
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #9 6-2 6-4 Albert Costa #23 Match data
Jun 7, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Albert Costa #18 6-3 4-6 6-2 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —