H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lleyton Hewitt vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 2-1
Lleyton Hewitt holds a 2–1 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2015 Australian Open second round 2-6 1-6 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 2-6 1-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2010* | Halle | ATP 500 | SF | Grass | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-2 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2009* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-3 6-3 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lleyton Hewitt | Benjamin Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |