H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 3-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–0 lead over Bjorn Phau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2011 San Jose third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Bjorn Phau
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2011* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #70 6-3 6-3 Bjorn Phau #93 Match data
May 16, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-3 6-3 Bjorn Phau #138 Match data
Jan 5, 2001* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #7 6-7(5) 6-4 6-0 Bjorn Phau #208 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Bjorn Phau #1,098 #59 1,038 1,733 80 138 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Bjorn Phau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #438 1,488 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1999 3–2 60.0% #323 1,540 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2000 0–4 0.0% #208 1,520 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2001 2–4 33.3% #183 1,579 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2002 1–6 14.3% #148 1,503 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2003 1–4 20.0% #158 1,519 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2004 5–4 55.6% #136 1,549 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2005 10–14 41.7% #87 1,636 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2006 16–26 38.1% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2007 4–10 28.6% #183 1,562 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2008 3–4 42.9% #120 1,663 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2009 12–17 41.4% #111 1,655 0 0
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2010 9–13 40.9% #102 1,620 0 0
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2011 2–7 22.2% #156 1,609 0 0
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2012 7–14 33.3% #75 1,656 0 0
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2013 2–6 25.0% #316 1,641 0 0
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2014 3–2 60.0% #371 1,699 0 0
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —