H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–0 on grass, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2000 Queen's Club quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2000* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Lleyton Hewitt #11 6-4 6-4 Cedric Pioline #6 Match data
Nov 6, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #17 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(6) Lleyton Hewitt #26 Match data
Jun 12, 1999* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Lleyton Hewitt #42 7-5 6-4 Cedric Pioline #59 Match data
Jan 20, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #101 6-3 6-1 6-1 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 — — — — — — —
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —