H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Denis Istomin H2H: 2-2

Lleyton Hewitt and Denis Istomin are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2013 Memphis fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2013* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Denis Istomin #63 6-1 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #107 Match data
Jan 4, 2013* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Denis Istomin #43 7-5 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #83 Match data
May 27, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #33 1-6 6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 Denis Istomin #72 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #22 7-6(5) 6-3 5-7 6-1 Denis Istomin #216 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 — — — — — — —
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2