H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 1-0

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 1–0 lead over Dmitry Tursunov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2004 Long Island semifinal 6-3 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-3 1-0 (ret.) Dmitry Tursunov #68 Match data Aug 28, 2004* SF Long Island International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,912 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 — — — — — — —
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,679 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,741 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,778 0 1
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 2008 35–22 61.4% #22 1,859 0 5
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,715 0 6
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,770 0 7
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 2012 3–10 23.1% #122 1,693 0 7
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,766 0 7
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,689 0 7
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,632 0 7
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Dmitry Tursunov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2001 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 31 16 47 66.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2007 15 11 26 57.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2008 28 14 42 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 12 15 27 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — 151 135 286 52.8% 27 44 71 38.0% 37 30 67 55.2% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 429/440 of Dmitry Tursunov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% 2001 3/4 6.7 4.0 57.0% 76.5% 45.5% 45.6% 18.6% 63.4% 33.6%
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% 2003 5/5 12.2 5.8 52.6% 70.3% 45.4% 47.1% 44.7% 58.6% 36.1%
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% 2004 29/29 6.9 5.0 53.5% 68.2% 50.3% 62.3% 34.5% 59.9% 34.8%
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% 2005 31/32 9.0 5.7 55.2% 77.7% 46.4% 65.7% 48.7% 63.8% 39.2%
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% 2006 72/73 8.7 3.8 54.8% 74.5% 50.9% 58.9% 41.5% 63.6% 38.0%
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% 2007 49/49 8.2 4.0 56.0% 74.9% 54.1% 49.4% 44.9% 65.7% 35.8%
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% 2008 53/57 8.0 3.2 58.4% 75.1% 51.7% 65.9% 40.8% 65.1% 36.0%
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% 2009 30/30 6.4 3.3 57.2% 73.8% 51.1% 64.0% 45.2% 64.0% 35.6%
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 2010 15/15 5.7 2.4 62.2% 69.5% 55.4% 58.5% 47.7% 64.2% 33.6%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 2011 35/36 6.6 4.1 60.6% 70.5% 49.8% 60.7% 42.6% 62.1% 34.0%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% 2012 12/13 6.2 2.7 58.5% 73.9% 46.6% 59.3% 22.0% 62.1% 32.5%
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% 2013 50/51 7.4 4.6 57.8% 74.3% 50.0% 59.7% 44.2% 63.7% 36.5%
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% 2014 31/32 5.6 3.1 61.3% 68.8% 50.5% 64.7% 46.4% 61.9% 35.0%
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% 2016 8/8 4.8 3.1 60.7% 66.9% 48.4% 60.5% 43.2% 59.5% 31.3%
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 65.3% 62.5% 40.5% 54.0% 35.1% 54.9% 30.2%
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8% — 429/440 7.4 3.9 57.4% 73.1% 50.5% 60.1% 42.4% 63.3% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 103.2 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) 104.4 -2.41 2001 1543 113.3 -0.56 +1.80 0.919 47.8% +43 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 2–0 — +0.16
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) 102.4 -2.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) 104.9 +1.18 2003 1611 120.7 -1.94 +0.40 0.873 47.6% +63 — — 38.9% -0.28 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) 108.8 -1.87 2004 1679 122.1 -2.57 -0.92 0.868 47.7% -8 -166 -127 41.8% -0.52 7–5 (58%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 -1.08
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 92.8 +1.40 2005 1742 140.2 +0.93 +1.97 1.082 51.8% -49 — -30 52.9% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -1.22
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 103.8 -2.32 2006 1778 142.8 +1.19 +1.27 1.045 50.9% -3 -200 -16 55.3% +0.27 16–17 (48%) 19–13 (59%) 102.4 +1.38
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) 107.6 -1.18 2007 1767 135.6 +1.31 -0.47 1.044 50.8% +2 -220 +74 54.5% +0.32 12–9 (57%) 12–7 (63%) 104.7 +2.65
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 +0.55 2008 1860 147.7 +1.87 +0.11 1.032 50.6% +36 -281 +4 57.0% +0.36 10–3 (77%) 14–11 (56%) 107.5 -0.15
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 94.4 +1.23 2009 1702 134.8 +0.01 -1.06 0.988 50.2% +12 — +189 47.9% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) 93.7 +1.41
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) 92.4 -1.01 2010 1715 128.5 +1.03 -0.62 0.937 49.0% +10 — — 43.6% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -0.47
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 97.5 -1.75 2011 1770 139.9 -0.29 -2.16 0.896 48.5% -29 — +155 50.0% -0.27 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 105.2 -0.69
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -0.34 2012 1693 121.2 -0.78 -2.26 0.857 47.3% +20 — +108 28.1% -1.16 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.15
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.11 2013 1869 152.8 +0.49 -0.37 1.006 50.7% +24 -219 — 58.8% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 15–5 (75%) 112.1 +0.52
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -0.31 2014 1766 144.7 -1.43 -0.21 0.917 49.1% +26 -36 -10 46.2% -0.08 2–4 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 98.4 +0.04
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 104.4 -1.05 2015 1753 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.9 -0.31 2016 1690 111.7 -2.62 -1.37 0.772 46.5% +48 — — 25.0% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 -0.60
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 90.2 +0.96 2017 1633 107.5 -2.99 -2.95 0.668 42.8% +52 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 — 1912 145.7 +0.30 -0.19 0.978 49.9% +7 -180 +50 50.7% +0.03 82–72 (53%) 104–89 (54%) 106.7 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.