H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-2

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2009 Tokyo fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2009* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #26 3-6 6-3 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #42 Match data
Jul 31, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #58 2-6 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #10 Match data
Mar 24, 2001* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #7 3-6 6-1 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #52 Match data
Jan 13, 2001* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #7 6-4 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #46 Match data
Aug 9, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #37 4-6 6-4 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6