H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 6-2

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 6–2 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2007 Wimbledon third round 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #19 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Canas #17 Match data
Jun 5, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Guillermo Canas #17 6-7(1) 7-6(13) 6-4 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #1 Match data
Oct 20, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 3-6 6-1 6-4 Guillermo Canas #18 Match data
Jun 24, 2001* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 F Grass Lleyton Hewitt #6 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Canas #61 Match data
Jun 6, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #6 3-6 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Canas #82 Match data
Jun 18, 1999* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #36 6-2 7-5 Guillermo Canas #72 Match data
May 6, 1999* Delray Beach ATP 250 R32 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #55 6-7(12) 6-2 6-4 Guillermo Canas #85 Match data
Apr 23, 1999* Orlando ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Canas #87 6-3 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30