H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Hendrik Dreekmann H2H: 0-1

Hendrik Dreekmann holds a 1–0 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hendrik Dreekmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hendrik Dreekmann won the 1998 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Hendrik Dreekmann
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hendrik Dreekmann #92 6-4 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #174 Match data Mar 11, 1998* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30
Hendrik Dreekmann #1,171 #39 1,013 1,788 95 116 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Hendrik Dreekmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2 1993 2–5 28.6% #166 1,506 0 0
19 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6 1994 15–22 40.5% #64 1,617 0 0
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 1995 14–17 45.2% #93 1,658 0 0
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17 1996 22–19 53.7% #49 1,756 0 0
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 1997 15–20 42.9% #91 1,629 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23 1998 16–16 50.0% #87 1,701 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24 1999 11–15 42.3% #129 1,637 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25 — — — — — — —
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26 — — — — — — —
27 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26 2002 0–1 0.0% #880 1,632 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27 2003 0–1 0.0% #888 1,624 0 0
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28 — — — — — — —
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28 — — — — — — —
31 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28 — — — — — — —
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28 — — — — — — —
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 — — — — — — —
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30 — — — — — — —
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Hendrik Dreekmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
21 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 16 8 24 66.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 7 6 13 53.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — 49 43 92 53.3% 21 34 55 38.2% 11 19 30 36.7% 14 20 34 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's and 178/211 of Hendrik Dreekmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Hendrik Dreekmann
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8% 1993 6/7 6.5 6.0 47.4% 73.1% 51.8% 60.7% 41.7% 61.4% 33.8%
19 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8% 1994 33/37 4.3 5.6 50.4% 70.2% 46.4% 52.4% 42.6% 58.5% 38.8%
20 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2% 1995 27/31 4.4 4.8 50.3% 75.4% 51.0% 53.7% 37.8% 63.2% 37.6%
21 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4% 1996 37/41 4.2 4.2 50.0% 74.5% 50.1% 61.4% 32.3% 62.6% 36.7%
22 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4% 1997 28/35 5.0 4.9 49.0% 73.2% 47.4% 62.9% 42.1% 60.0% 35.6%
23 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7% 1998 24/32 8.2 5.5 51.2% 75.3% 47.1% 61.6% 45.9% 61.5% 36.1%
24 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3% 1999 21/26 4.8 3.5 50.1% 70.3% 47.5% 51.4% 45.5% 58.5% 36.7%
25 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0% 2002 1/1 10.0 9.0 59.4% 76.2% 55.8% 71.4% — 67.9% 21.7%
28 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5% 2003 1/1 4.0 3.0 62.7% 61.9% 44.0% 66.7% — 55.2% 17.8%
29 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8% — 178/211 5.1 4.8 50.2% 73.1% 48.5% 57.7% 39.9% 60.8% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Hendrik Dreekmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 103.2 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) 104.4 -2.41 1993 1506 112.3 +0.25 -1.05 0.876 48.4% -8 — +113 36.8% -0.42 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -0.10
19 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) 102.4 -2.06 1994 1617 132.2 -1.98 -0.24 0.935 48.5% -12 -11 -48 46.7% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 8–7 (53%) 101.7 -0.37
20 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) 104.9 +1.18 1995 1659 137.2 +1.00 -0.01 1.022 50.1% +7 -35 -108 47.6% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.93
21 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) 108.8 -1.87 1996 1757 145.6 +0.64 +0.24 0.981 49.8% +44 -147 -205 54.3% -0.04 4–8 (33%) 14–3 (82%) 104.8 -1.87
22 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 92.8 +1.40 1997 1630 130.2 -1.06 -1.46 0.892 48.4% +89 -33 -2 43.2% -0.59 6–5 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 -0.39
23 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 103.8 -2.32 1998 1702 133.6 +0.64 -0.31 0.939 49.1% +8 -77 -65 49.4% -0.11 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -1.13
24 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) 107.6 -1.18 1999 1637 129.2 -2.27 -0.71 0.885 47.7% +67 -24 -42 43.3% -0.48 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 -1.19
25 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 94.4 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) 92.4 -1.01 2002 1633 103.0 +1.77 +3.12 0.678 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.36
28 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 97.5 -1.75 2003 1625 97.0 +1.94 -0.32 0.397 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.25
29 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 104.4 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.9 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 90.2 +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21 — 1788 140.4 -0.40 -0.37 0.937 48.9% +29 -50 -47 47.2% -0.31 33–44 (43%) 43–31 (58%) 107.2 -3.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.