H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lleyton Hewitt vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-0
Lleyton Hewitt holds a 2–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2006 Wimbledon second round 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lleyton Hewitt | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 5-7 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lleyton Hewitt | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |