H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lleyton Hewitt vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 2-4

Ivo Karlovic holds a 4–2 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 3–1 on grass, while Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2014 Newport final 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 13, 2014* Newport ATP 250 F Grass Lleyton Hewitt #43 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) Ivo Karlovic #31 Match data
Jun 13, 2012* Queen's Club ATP 500 R64 Grass Ivo Karlovic #56 6-3 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #205 Match data
May 27, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #48 6-7(1) 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #28 Match data
Oct 6, 2007* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard Ivo Karlovic #28 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Lleyton Hewitt #19 Match data
Jun 11, 2005* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Ivo Karlovic #77 7-6(4) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #2 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Ivo Karlovic #203 1-6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lleyton Hewitt Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6 — — — — — — —
20 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12 — — — — — — —
21 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17 — — — — — — —
22 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8